Publications

2022

Xu, Jonathan T., Aaron Perecman, Adam Wiggins, Thomas Kalantzakos, Sanjna Das, Travis B Sullivan, and Kimberly M Rieger-Christ. (2022) 2022. “MetastamiRs in Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Overview of MicroRNA Implicated in Metastatic Kidney Cancer”. Urologic Cancers, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.36255/exon-publications-urologic-cancers-microrna-renal-cell-carcinoma.

MicroRNAs are short noncoding RNAs that regulate post-transcriptional protein expression. Aberrant microRNA expression has been widely implicated in cancer biology with various effects depending on the affected downstream target(s). In renal cell carcinoma, microRNAs have been shown to influence metastasis by targeting oncogenes or tumor suppressors in complex regulatory networks­­ - leading them to be coined “metastamiRs.” This chapter aims to identify the microRNAs responsible for metastasis in renal cell carcinoma, review their molecular function and oncologic outcome, and discuss their potential roles for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

Regis, Shawn M, Andrea Borondy-Kitts, Andrea B McKee, Kimberly Rieger-Christ, Jacob Sands, Jalil Afnan, and Brady J McKee. (2022) 2022. “Outcomes of Positive and Suspicious Findings in Clinical Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening and the Road Ahead.”. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 19 (8): 1371-78. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202106-733OC.

Rationale: Future optimization of computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening (CTLS) algorithms will depend on clinical outcomes data. Objectives: To report the outcomes of positive and suspicious findings in a clinical CTLS program. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed results for patients from our institution undergoing lung cancer screening from January 2012 through December 2018, with follow-up through December 2019. All exams were retrospectively rescored using Lung-RADS v1.1 (LR). Metrics assessed included positive, probably benign, and suspicious exam rates, frequency/nature of care escalation, and lung cancer detection rates after a positive, probably benign, and suspicious exam result and overall. We calculated time required to resolve suspicious exams as malignant or benign. Results were broken down by subcategories, reason for positive/suspicious designation, and screening round. Results: During the study period 4,301 individuals underwent a total of 10,897 exams. The number of positive (13.9%), suspicious (5.5%), and significant incidental (6.4%) findings was significantly higher at baseline screening. Cancer detection and false-positive rates were 2.0% and 12.3% at baseline versus 1.3% and 5.1% across subsequent screening rounds, respectively. Baseline solid nodule(s) 6 to <8 mm were the only probably benign findings resulting in lung cancer detection within 12 months. New solid nodules 6 to <8 mm were the only LR category 4A (LR4A) findings falling within the LR predicted cancer detection range of 5-15% (12.8%). 38.5% of LR4A cancers were detected within 3 months. Conclusions: Modification of the definition and suggested workup of positive and suspicious lung cancer screening findings appears warranted.

Lee, Rebecca J, Oskar Wysocki, Cong Zhou, Rohan Shotton, Ann Tivey, Louise Lever, Joshua Woodcock, et al. (2022) 2022. “Establishment of CORONET, COVID-19 Risk in Oncology Evaluation Tool, to Identify Patients With Cancer at Low Versus High Risk of Severe Complications of COVID-19 Disease On Presentation to Hospital.”. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 6: e2100177. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00177.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease, but have heterogeneous presentations and outcomes. Decision-making tools for hospital admission, severity prediction, and increased monitoring for early intervention are critical. We sought to identify features of COVID-19 disease in patients with cancer predicting severe disease and build a decision support online tool, COVID-19 Risk in Oncology Evaluation Tool (CORONET).

METHODS: Patients with active cancer (stage I-IV) and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 disease presenting to hospitals worldwide were included. Discharge (within 24 hours), admission (≥ 24 hours inpatient), oxygen (O2) requirement, and death were combined in a 0-3 point severity scale. Association of features with outcomes were investigated using Lasso regression and Random Forest combined with Shapley Additive Explanations. The CORONET model was then examined in the entire cohort to build an online CORONET decision support tool. Admission and severe disease thresholds were established through pragmatically defined cost functions. Finally, the CORONET model was validated on an external cohort.

RESULTS: The model development data set comprised 920 patients, with median age 70 (range 5-99) years, 56% males, 44% females, and 81% solid versus 19% hematologic cancers. In derivation, Random Forest demonstrated superior performance over Lasso with lower mean squared error (0.801 v 0.807) and was selected for development. During validation (n = 282 patients), the performance of CORONET varied depending on the country cohort. CORONET cutoffs for admission and mortality of 1.0 and 2.3 were established. The CORONET decision support tool recommended admission for 95% of patients eventually requiring oxygen and 97% of those who died (94% and 98% in validation, respectively). The specificity for mortality prediction was 92% and 83% in derivation and validation, respectively. Shapley Additive Explanations revealed that National Early Warning Score 2, C-reactive protein, and albumin were the most important features contributing to COVID-19 severity prediction in patients with cancer at time of hospital presentation.

CONCLUSION: CORONET, a decision support tool validated in health care systems worldwide, can aid admission decisions and predict COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer.

Yambayev, Ilyas, Travis B Sullivan, Kimberly M Rieger-Christ, Elliot L Servais, Cameron T Stock, Syed M Quadri, Jacob M Sands, Kei Suzuki, and Eric J Burks. (2022) 2022. “Vascular Invasion Identifies the Most Aggressive Histologic Subset of Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Adjuvant Therapy.”. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 171: 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.016.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 15% of stage I lung adenocarcinomas will recur despite adequate surgical therapy. Adjuvant therapy may benefit specific high-risk subsets; however, it is unclear which patients are sufficiently predisposed to recurrence to warrant intensified therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 517 AJCC 8th edition stage I/0 lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 4 cm total size were graded (WHO-2015 and WHO-2021) and compared to stage subgroupings using 7-year recurrence free (RFS), disease specific (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Low malignant potential (LMP) adenocarcinoma was assigned as previously defined. Univariate/multivariate analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with aggressive behavior.

RESULTS: Vascular invasion was the most significant histologic feature on multivariate analysis for both RFS (HR = 4.68, p < 0.001) and DSS (HR = 3.67, p = 0.001) and nearly reached significance for OS (HR = 1.47, p = 0.060). Angioinvasive adenocarcinomas comprised 26 % of the cohort and exhibited a 7-year 64 % RFS, 73 % DSS, and 50 % OS; in contrast to 20 % WHO-2015-G3 (7-year 71 % RFS, 79 % DSS, & 54 % OS), 44 % WHO-2021-G3 (7-year 79 % RFS, 85 % DSS, & 56 % OS), and 21 % stage IB (7-year 72 % RFS, 79 % DSS, and 50 % OS) adenocarcinomas. The majority (>50 %) of overall mortality was disease specific for angioinvasive adenocarcinoma whereas ≤25 % of overall mortality was disease specific for the remaining tumors. Angioinvasive adenocarcinomas were proportionally more common among those still smoking at diagnosis (49 %), male sex (49 %), and black race (16 %) than other subtypes.

CONCLUSION: Patients with AJCC 8th ed. stage I angioinvasive lung adenocarcinomas are at high-risk of cancer-specific mortality and should be considered for clinical trials evaluating benefit of adjuvant therapy.

Wysocki, Oskar, Cong Zhou, Jacobo Rogado, Prerana Huddar, Rohan Shotton, Ann Tivey, Laurence Albiges, et al. (2022) 2022. “An International Comparison of Presentation, Outcomes and CORONET Predictive Score Performance in Patients With Cancer Presenting With COVID-19 across Different Pandemic Waves.”. Cancers 14 (16). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163931.

Patients with cancer have been shown to have increased risk of COVID-19 severity. We previously built and validated the COVID-19 Risk in Oncology Evaluation Tool (CORONET) to predict the likely severity of COVID-19 in patients with active cancer who present to hospital. We assessed the differences in presentation and outcomes of patients with cancer and COVID-19, depending on the wave of the pandemic. We examined differences in features at presentation and outcomes in patients worldwide, depending on the waves of the pandemic: wave 1 D614G (n = 1430), wave 2 Alpha (n = 475), and wave 4 Omicron variant (n = 63, UK and Spain only). The performance of CORONET was evaluated on 258, 48, and 54 patients for each wave, respectively. We found that mortality rates were reduced in subsequent waves. The majority of patients were vaccinated in wave 4, and 94% were treated with steroids if they required oxygen. The stages of cancer and the median ages of patients significantly differed, but features associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes remained predictive and did not differ between waves. The CORONET tool performed well in all waves, with scores in an area under the curve (AUC) of >0.72. We concluded that patients with cancer who present to hospital with COVID-19 have similar features of severity, which remain discriminatory despite differences in variants and vaccination status. Survival improved following the first wave of the pandemic, which may be associated with vaccination and the increased steroid use in those patients requiring oxygen. The CORONET model demonstrated good performance, independent of the SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Kalantzakos, Thomas J, Luke E Sebel, James Trussler, Travis B Sullivan, Eric J Burks, Carmen D Sarita-Reyes, David Canes, Alireza Moinzadeh, and Kimberly M Rieger-Christ. (2022) 2022. “MicroRNA Associated With the Invasive Phenotype in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Let-7c-5p Inhibits Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion by Targeting Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Receptor.”. Biomedicines 10 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102425.

Differential microRNA (miRNA) expression can portend clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) progression. In a previous study, we identified a subset of dysregulated miRNA in small renal masses, pT1 ccRCC (≤5 cm) that are associated with an aggressive phenotype. The present study investigated miRNA expression in clinical stage I (cT1) tumors (≤5 cm), comparing pathologic stage I (pT1) tumors to those upstaged to pathologic stage 3 (pT3) after surgery following identification of renal vein invasion or invasion into adjacent fat tissue within Gerota's fascia. Twenty cT1 tumors were examined in an miRNA screening, 10 pT1 and 10 pT3 tumors. The ccRCC cell lines 786-O and Caki-1 were used to assess the impact of let-7c-5p and its protein target insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R). Cells were transfected with pre-let-7c-5p and assessed through cell proliferation, migration, and invasion assays. IGF1R expression was evaluated through Simple Western, and interaction between let-7c-5p and IGF1R was confirmed via luciferase reporter assay. Screening identified 20 miRNA, including let-7c-5p, that were dysregulated between pT1 and pT3 upstaged tumors. This miRNA was also downregulated in our previous study of pT1 tumors that progressed to metastatic disease. Transfection of ccRCC cells with pre-let-7c-5p significantly inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion, and IGF1R expression. These findings suggest that miRNA dysregulation is involved in ccRCC progression, specifically through invasion, and that let-7c-5p downregulation contributes to the aggressiveness of small ccRCC tumors, in part, through its regulation of IGF1R.

Xu, Ke, Xingyi Shi, Christopher Husted, Rui Hong, Yichen Wang, Boting Ning, Travis B Sullivan, et al. (2022) 2022. “Smoking Modulates Different Secretory Subpopulations Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Entry Genes in the Nasal and Bronchial Airways.”. Scientific Reports 12 (1): 18168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17832-6.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity are influenced by viral entry (VE) gene expression patterns in the airway epithelium. The similarities and differences of VE gene expression (ACE2, TMPRSS2, and CTSL) across nasal and bronchial compartments have not been fully characterized using matched samples from large cohorts. Gene expression data from 793 nasal and 1673 bronchial brushes obtained from individuals participating in lung cancer screening or diagnostic workup revealed that smoking status (current versus former) was the only clinical factor significantly and reproducibly associated with VE gene expression. The expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 was higher in smokers in the bronchus but not in the nose. scRNA-seq of nasal brushings indicated that ACE2 co-expressed genes were highly expressed in club and C15orf48+ secretory cells while TMPRSS2 co-expressed genes were highly expressed in keratinizing epithelial cells. In contrast, these ACE2 and TMPRSS2 modules were highly expressed in goblet cells in scRNA-seq from bronchial brushings. Cell-type deconvolution of the gene expression data confirmed that smoking increased the abundance of several secretory cell populations in the bronchus, but only goblet cells in the nose. The association of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 with smoking in the bronchus is due to their high expression in goblet cells which increase in abundance in current smoker airways. In contrast, in the nose, these genes are not predominantly expressed in cell populations modulated by smoking. In individuals with elevated lung cancer risk, smoking-induced VE gene expression changes in the nose likely have minimal impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection, but in the bronchus, smoking may lead to higher viral loads and more severe disease.

2021

Yambayev, Ilyas, Travis B Sullivan, Kei Suzuki, Qing Zhao, Sara E Higgins, Osman H Yilmaz, Virginia R Litle, et al. (2021) 2021. “Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas of Low Malignant Potential: Proposed Criteria to Expand the Spectrum Beyond Adenocarcinoma In Situ and Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma.”. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 45 (4): 567-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001618.

Lung cancer screening has improved mortality among high-risk smokers but has coincidentally detected a fraction of nonprogressive adenocarcinoma historically classified as bronchoalveolar carcinoma (BAC). In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) the majority of BAC-comprising 29% of computed tomography-detected stage I lung adenocarcinoma-were considered overdiagnosis after extended follow-up comparison with the control arm. In the current classification, adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma have replaced BAC but together comprise only ∼5% of stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Lepidic and subsets of papillary and acinar adenocarcinoma also infrequently recur. We, therefore, propose criteria for low malignant potential (LMP) adenocarcinoma among nonmucinous adenocarcinoma measuring ≤3 cm in total, exhibiting ≥15% lepidic growth, and lacking nonpredominant high-grade patterns (≥10% cribriform, ≥5% micropapillary, ≥5% solid), >1 mitosis per 2 mm2, angiolymphatic or visceral pleural invasion, spread through air spaces or necrosis. We tested these criteria in a multi-institutional cohort of 328 invasive stage I (eighth edition) and in situ adenocarcinomas and observed 16% LMP and 7% adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma which together (23%) approximated the frequency of overdiagnosed stage I BAC in the NLST. The LMP group had 100% disease-specific survival. The proposed LMP criteria, incorporating multiple histologic parameters, may be a clinically useful "low-grade" prognostic group. Validation of these criteria in additional retrospective cohorts and prospective screen-detected cohorts should be considered.

Muus, Christoph, Malte D Luecken, Gökcen Eraslan, Lisa Sikkema, Avinash Waghray, Graham Heimberg, Yoshihiko Kobayashi, et al. (2021) 2021. “Single-Cell Meta-Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry Genes across Tissues and Demographics.”. Nature Medicine 27 (3): 546-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01227-z.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and accessory proteases (TMPRSS2 and CTSL) are needed for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cellular entry, and their expression may shed light on viral tropism and impact across the body. We assessed the cell-type-specific expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and CTSL across 107 single-cell RNA-sequencing studies from different tissues. ACE2, TMPRSS2 and CTSL are coexpressed in specific subsets of respiratory epithelial cells in the nasal passages, airways and alveoli, and in cells from other organs associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission or pathology. We performed a meta-analysis of 31 lung single-cell RNA-sequencing studies with 1,320,896 cells from 377 nasal, airway and lung parenchyma samples from 228 individuals. This revealed cell-type-specific associations of age, sex and smoking with expression levels of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and CTSL. Expression of entry factors increased with age and in males, including in airway secretory cells and alveolar type 2 cells. Expression programs shared by ACE2+TMPRSS2+ cells in nasal, lung and gut tissues included genes that may mediate viral entry, key immune functions and epithelial-macrophage cross-talk, such as genes involved in the interleukin-6, interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor and complement pathways. Cell-type-specific expression patterns may contribute to the pathogenesis of COVID-19, and our work highlights putative molecular pathways for therapeutic intervention.

Gazourian, Lee, William B Thedinger, Shawn M Regis, Elizabeth J Pagura, Lori Lyn Price, Melissa Gawlik, Cristina F Stefanescu, et al. (2021) 2021. “Qualitative Emphysema and Risk of COPD Hospitalization in a Multicenter CT Lung Cancer Screening Cohort Study.”. Respiratory Medicine 176: 106245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106245.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, 9 to 10 million Americans are estimated to be eligible for computed tomographic lung cancer screening (CTLS). Those meeting criteria for CTLS are at high-risk for numerous cardio-pulmonary co-morbidities. The objective of this study was to determine the association between qualitative emphysema identified on screening CTs and risk for hospital admission.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study from two CTLS cohorts: Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (LHMC) CTLS program, Burlington, MA and Mount Auburn Hospital (MAH) CTLS program, Cambridge, MA. CTLS exams were qualitatively scored by radiologists at time of screening for presence of emphysema. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between CT qualitative emphysema and all-cause, COPD-related, and pneumonia-related hospital admission.

RESULTS: We included 4673 participants from the LHMC cohort and 915 from the MAH cohort. 57% and 51.9% of the LHMC and MAH cohorts had presence of CT emphysema, respectively. In the LHMC cohort, the presence of emphysema was associated with all-cause hospital admission (HR 1.15, CI 1.07-1.23; p < 0.001) and COPD-related admission (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.14-2.36; p = 0.007), but not with pneumonia-related admission (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.27-1.83; p < 0.001). In the MAH cohort, the presence of emphysema was only associated with COPD-related admission (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.07-3.95; p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION: Qualitative CT assessment of emphysema is associated with COPD-related hospital admission in a CTLS population. Identification of emphysema on CLTS exams may provide an opportunity for prevention and early intervention to reduce admission risk.