Publications

2005

Brown, Calvin A, Eric S Nadel, and David F M Brown. (2005) 2005. “Penetrating Torso Trauma.”. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 28 (3): 325-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.12.007.

2004

Davidson, Steven J, Frank L Zwemer, Larry A Nathanson, Kenneth N Sable, and Abu N G A Khan. (2004) 2004. “Where’s the Beef? The Promise and the Reality of Clinical Documentation.”. Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 11 (11): 1127-34.

Physician-generated emergency department clinical documentation (information obtained from clinician observations and summarized decision processes inclusive of all manner of electronic systems capturing, storing, and presenting clinical documentation) serves four purposes: recording of medical care and communication among providers; payment for hospital and physician; legal defense from medical negligence allegations; and symptom/disease surveillance, public health, and research functions. In the consensus development process described by Handler, these objectives were balanced with the consideration of efficiency, often evaluated as physician time and clinical documentation system costs, in recording the information necessary for their accomplishment. The consensus panel session participants and authors recommend that 1) clinical documentation be electronically retrievable; 2) selection and implementation be evidence-based and grounded on valid metrics (research is needed to identify these metrics); 3) the user interface be crafted to promote clinical excellence through high-quality information collection and efficient charting techniques; 4) the priorities for integration of clinical information be standardized and implemented within enterprises and across health and information systems; 5) systems use accepted standards for bidirectional, real-time clinical data exchange, without limiting the location or number of simultaneous users; 6) systems fully utilize existing electronic sources of specific patient information and general medical knowledge; 7) systems automatically and reliably capture appropriate data that support electronic billing for emergency department services; and 8) systems promote bedside documentation and mobile access.

2003

McClennen, Seth, Larry A Nathanson, Charles Safran, and Ary L Goldberger. (2003) 2003. “ECG Wave-Maven: An Internet-Based Electrocardiography Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians.”. Medical Education Online 8 (1): 4339. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v8i.4339.

PURPOSE: To create a multimedia internet-based ECG teaching tool, with the ability to rapidly incorporate new clinical cases.

METHOD: We created ECG Wave-Maven ( http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu ), a novel teaching tool with a direct link to an institution-wide clinical repository. We analyzed usage data from the web between December, 2000 and May 2002.

RESULTS: In 17 months, there have been 4105 distinct uses of the program. A majority of users are physicians or medical students (2605, 63%), and almost half report use as an educational tool.

CONCLUSIONS: The internet offers an opportunity to provide easily-expandable, open access resources for ECG pedagogy which may be used to complement traditional methods of instruction.

2002