Publications

2025

Goldsmith, Andrew, Nicole M Duggan, Yonatan G Keschner, Da’Marcus E Baymon, Andrew D Luo, Arun Nagdev, Tina Kapur, Samuel Caplan, David A Meguerdichian, and Christopher W Baugh. (2025) 2025. “National Cost Savings From Use of Artificial Intelligence Guided Echocardiography in the Assessment of Intermediate-Risk Patients With Syncope in the Emergency Department.”. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 6 (3): 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100139.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to estimate the realistic impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TTE)-first strategy on the annual national cost savings among eligible adult emergency department (ED) patients presenting with syncope in the United States. Our secondary outcomes were the estimated reduction in avoidable ED bed hours and comprehensive TTE studies.

METHODS: Using publicly available estimates for inputs such as the size of the adult ED syncope population, typical disposition and risk stratification proportions, and frequency of comprehensive TTE studies, we created a model and ran 1000 trials of a Monte Carlo simulation. Using this simulation, we modeled the national annual cost savings and potential bed hours averted through the impact of avoiding comprehensive TTE studies. We report the descriptive statistics modeling the distribution of all endpoints.

RESULTS: An AI-assisted TTE-first strategy was estimated to save a mean (±SD) of $815 million (±$260 million) by avoiding 468,000 (±141,000) comprehensive TTE studies resulting in 12,500,000 (±4,600,000) bed hours saved.

CONCLUSION: If adopted widely, an AI-based TTE-first strategy applied to eligible ED patients presenting with syncope could yield substantial benefits by averting avoidable comprehensive TTE studies and saving bed hours.

Goldsmith, Andrew J, Jeffrey Merz-Herrala, Jamie Gullikson, Lauren A Selame, Rebecca E Cash, David Martin, Lachlan Driver, et al. (2025) 2025. “The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transgluteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks for Sciatic Radiculopathy Pain in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Prospective Study.”. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 6 (3): 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100137.

OBJECTIVES: Pain from acute sciatic radiculopathy (sciatica) can be debilitating, frequently leading to emergency department (ED) presentations. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transgluteal sciatic nerve blocks (TGSNBs) for ED-based pain control in patients presenting with acute sciatica.

METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, observational study, a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED with acute sciatica were recruited between January 2022 and August 2023. All patients underwent TGSNB. Patients' self-reported pain scores and timed up and go test results were recorded. Pain scores at 24 and 48 hours post-ED disposition were also recorded. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank, and ꭓ2 tests were utilized for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: In total, 63 patients were enrolled. The median pain score was 9 (IQR, 8-10) prior to TGSNB, decreased to 5 (IQR, 3-7; P < .001) post-TGSNB, and remained at 4 (IQR, 2-6.5; P < .001) at approximately 48 hours after disposition. On arrival, 27% (n = 17/63) of patients were unable to ambulate, which decreased to 11% (n = 7/63) post-TGSNB. The proportion of patients who completed the timed up and go test in under 10 seconds significantly increased to 33% (n = 19/63) at ED disposition compared to 1.6% (n = 1/63; P = .003) on presentation. One complication (1.6%, n = 1/63) of a transient foot drop was noted which resolved without further sequelae.

CONCLUSION: Among the specific study population, patients with acute sciatica who elected to have an ultrasound-guided TGSNB in the ED showed significant improvements in pain scores and function. Future studies comparing the efficacy of TGSNB versus standard medical therapy are needed.

Shokoohi, Hamid, Gary D Peksa, Ainsley Hutchison, Nour Al Jalbout, Kristofer Montoya, Jennifer C Westrick, Andrew Goldsmith, Peiman Nazerian, and Michael Gottlieb. (2025) 2025. “Ultrasound Accuracy in Acute Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.”. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 92: 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.002.

OBJECTIVES: The utility of ultrasound for diagnosing diverticulitis, especially in high-risk cases with complicated diverticulitis, remains debated. This study aimed to provide contemporary quantitative data synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with suspected diverticulitis.

METHODS: Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL were searched from January 1st,1990 to September 15th, 2023, for potentially relevant articles. Selected studies evaluated and reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis using CT as the gold standard. Subgroup analyses were conducted for simple versus complicated diverticulitis, and for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS). Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Diagnostic odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

RESULTS: A total of 12 diagnostic studies (n = 2056 patients) were identified. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 92.5 % (95 % CI 86.9 %-95.8 %) and specificity of 87.7 % (95 % CI 75.7 %-94.2 %) for detecting acute diverticulitis. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 8.28 (95 % CI 4.74-14.45) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.08 (95 % CI 0.05-0.15). For complicated diverticulitis ultrasound had a sensitivity of 58.3 % (95 % CI 46.1 %-69.8 %) and specificity of 98.2 % (95 % CI 96.4-99.2). The LR+ was 31.86 (95 % CI 15.61-65.06) and LR- was -0.42 (95 % CI 0.32-0.56)). Subgroup analysis showed POCUS had 94.1 % (95 % CI 91.4 %-95.9 %) sensitivity and 89.8 % (95 % CI 77.6 %-95.7 %) specificity, while RADUS had 83.2 % (95 % CI 68.3 %-91.9 %) sensitivity and 88.7 % (95 % CI 76.1 %-95.1 %) specificity for detecting acute diverticulitis.

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound had high accuracy for diagnosing acute diverticulitis with greater sensitivity when performed by emergency physicians and surgeons at the bedside. For complicated diverticulitis, the overall sensitivity was lower, while the specificity was higher.

Milgrim, Frederick, Matthew Riscinti, Andrew Goldsmith, Arun Nagdev, and Joseph Brown. (2025) 2025. “Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks: Developing a Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Program.”. Internal and Emergency Medicine 20 (3): 933-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03901-x.

Managing acute pain in the Emergency Department (ED) is one of the primary roles of an Emergency Physician (EP), but the constraints of using opiate sparing medications provide an additional challenge for EPs to circumnavigate. In an effort to avoid opioids, many EPs have turned to ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs), which have demonstrated outstanding analgesia, in addition to a strong safety profile, decreased risk of delirium, and shortened ED lengths of stay. Some of the primary obstacles to performing nerve blocks, however, are institutional barriers, including buy-in from ED leadership and other hospital stakeholders, ensuring appropriate equipment as well as a lack of provider familiarity with UGNBs. Here, we lay out a framework for developing a nerve block program from scratch, which includes highlighting the various stakeholders and their respective roles, how to set up quality assurance monitoring, educational guidelines, and safety measures. As more EPs are performing UGNBs globally, it is imperative for EDs to initiate block programs, and we hope that these guidelines help provide a starting point for such departmental initiatives.

Barton, Michael F, Kailynn M Barton, Andrew J Goldsmith, Michael Gottlieb, Christopher Harris, Mark Chottiner, Brenna L Barton, et al. (2025) 2025. “POCUS-First in Acute Diverticulitis: Quantifying Cost Savings, Length-of-Stay Reduction, and Radiation Risk Mitigation in the ED.”. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 88: 204-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.079.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have validated the efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative diagnostic imaging approach to computed tomography (CT) for patients with suspected acute diverticulitis. This study aimed to quantify the national impact of this approach in cost savings, ED length-of-stay (LOS), and radiation risk mitigation using a POCUS-first approach for acute diverticulitis in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS: Using published data, we constructed a Monte Carlo simulation model to compare two POCUS-first strategies (nonselective and selective approaches) for evaluating patients with suspected acute diverticulitis in the ED. Primary outcomes were cost savings, reduction in ED LOS, and radiation risk mitigation.

RESULTS: In our simulation model, both nonselective and selective POCUS-first strategies showed substantial potential reductions in the annual number of CTs. Notably, the selective approach led to significantly fewer estimated POCUS examinations (433,847 ± 45,103 exams vs 720,048 ± 55,815 exams, p < 0.001) resulting in greater cost savings ($94,620,235 ± $10,090,807 vs $70,017,473 ± $11,583,911, p < 0.001) and greater reductions in ED LOS (508,569 ± 640,048 bed-hours vs 332,518 ± 774,485 bed-hours, p < 0.001). Reduction in radiation exposure was comparable between the two approaches (8,779,414 ± 2,389,982 mSv vs 8,846,058 ± 2,420,185 mSv, p = 0.536).

CONCLUSION: Both POCUS-first models can achieve substantial national annual cost savings, ED LOS reduction, and decreases in radiation exposure compared to the traditional CT-first approach. POCUS should be strongly considered as a first-line imaging modality for acute diverticulitis especially among low-risk patients.