Clinical evaluation of large language models (LLMs) currently relies on static datasets and isolated scenarios that fail to capture the cascading effects of healthcare decisions. We propose the Clinical Environment Simulator (CES), a framework that evaluates clinical LLMs within digital hospital environments where every decision dynamically alters future states. The CES would use a parallel simulation architecture: a 'hospital engine' that tracks bed availability, staff workloads and equipment status in real time, and a 'patient engine' that simulates disease progression and treatment responses based on LLM interventions. Unlike current benchmarks, the CES framework requires clinical LLMs to execute decisions through realistic electronic health record interfaces, while managing trade-offs between individual patient optimization and system-wide efficiency. The CES enables three critical evaluations absent from current benchmarks: temporal reasoning under evolving constraints, where delayed diagnostics can lead to patient deterioration; resource-aware decision-making, where aggressive workups for one patient may exhaust capacity needed by others; and operational resilience, through adversarial testing with simultaneous emergencies and system failures. By scoring LLM performance on both clinical outcomes and operational metrics, the CES represents a shift toward evaluating clinical LLMs as a dynamic and integrated component of healthcare delivery systems.
Publications
2026
Luo, Luyang, Sung Eun Kim, Xiaoman Zhang, Julius M Kernbach, Roshan Kenia, Julian N Acosta, Larry A Nathanson, et al. (2026) 2026. “A Clinical Environment Simulator for Dynamic AI Evaluation.”. Nature Medicine 32 (3): 820-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04252-6.
2025
Walsh, C, RE Harari, R Dias, NM Duggan, RE Cash, D Lee, P Borges, and . 2025. “Head Motion Analysis As an Objective Measure of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Procedural Guidance Competency.”
Le, NN, J Brown, F Milgrim, A Cowett, N Duggan, A Dreyfuss, A Goldsmith, and . 2025. “Highlights and Takeaways from the Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Workshop”. Emergency Medicine News 47 (7): 21–21.
Hernandez, P, G Maldonado, A Goldsmith, and H Shokoohi. 2025. “317 Artificial Intelligence for Ultrasound Nerve Block Training Among Emergency Medicine Clinicians”. Annals of Emergency Medicine 86 (3), S138-S 139.
Brown, J, F Milgrim, M Riscinti, and A Goldsmith. 2025. “Response to Comment on ‘Efficacy and Safety of Adjunct Medications in ED Ultrasound‐Guided Nerve Blocks: A National Ultrasound‐Guided NeRVE (NURVE) Block Registry Study’”. Academic Emergency Medicine 32 (12): 1378–1379.
Brown, J, M Prats, H Stroud, A Goldsmith, and A Nagdev. 2025. “High Utility Ultrasound Guided Nerve Blocks for Emergency Department Use”. The Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Harari, RE, A Altaweel, E Anderson, C Pozner, R Grossmann, A Goldsmith, and . 2025. “Augmented Reality in Enhancing Operating Room Crisis Checklist Adherence: Randomized Comparative Efficacy Study”. JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR) 2 (1): 60792.
Driver, L, L Perice, JR Brown, A Nagdev, and A Goldsmith. 2025. “Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks: Expert Opinion Statement on Patient Monitoring in the Emergency Department Setting”. Internal and Emergency Medicine 20 (8): 2589–2591.
Brown, J, F Milgrim, L Driver, MA Meeker, R Tucker, NN Le, A Nagdev, and . 2025. “Efficacy and Safety of Adjunct Medications in ED Ultrasound‐Guided Nerve Blocks: A National Ultrasound‐Guided NeRVE (NURVE) Block Registry Study”. Academic Emergency Medicine 32 (12): 1299–1308.
Chilstrom, M, A Goldsmith, J Stegeman, C Mikell, and A Nagdev. 2025. “Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks”. Advanced Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Comprehensive Review, 475–502.